Edited Image of WSJ Grid of Shame from David Leavitt |
Every year the WSJ puts out an updated Grid of Shame weighing football programs' on- and off-field successes and blemishes. It shows in some manner the difference between schools who have success (are considered a Powerhouse) but with shady, or shameful, win-at-all-costs practices vs. those that try for character first and success second. Of course a program that can score high on both Powerhouse and Admiration are truly 'elite' programs. In this year's edition, UW has scored highest on the Admirable scale and is near the top of Powerhouse.
Only 5 teams rank higher on the Powerhouse scale, that's pretty good right there, but no one ranks higher on Admirable. The only team close is Washington who is slightly higher on Powerhouse and slightly lower on Admirable. Only 3 other teams are anywhere close on Admirable.
Now this is specifically for football but it likely extends naturally to all programs at least on the Admirable scale. But as we saw earlier, many UW programs would rank high on the Powerhouse as well.
During a time when pro and college sports seem to be in mercenary mode, picking for talent alone not character, and college teams - specifically men's basketball and football, especially basketball - want flash in the pan players who will help now and not develop them (the NBA one-and-done rule taking players after 1 year except programs where the education is valued from start to finish) it means a lot for a program to do it cleanly.
In Wisconsin we call all be proud of our flagship university being so highly considered. Wisconsin is finally getting some national recognition for its overall excellence in athletics, but it is even better to know they are doing it 'admirably'.
Comments
Post a Comment